18th Feb 2015

USA Today

Internet business partners Ari Goldberger, left, and Larry Fischer, demonstrate how they search and buy domain names on the Internet, an estimated $2 billion industry.

Internet business partners Ari Goldberger, left, and Larry Fischer, demonstrate
how they search and buy domain names on the Internet, an estimated $2 billion industry.

By Adam Goldman, Associated Press
NEW YORK — Inside a midtown hotel, Larry
Fischer is on his cellphone with a financial backer as his partner Ari
Goldberger does quick research on a laptop computer.

They are bidding furiously at this auction of
Internet domain names, with hopes of snagging megayachts.com. The duo
won’t be deterred. They want this name.

“$110,000, yes or no? Quick,” Fischer barks at Eli, the investor at the end of the phone.

Someone else makes a bid for $120,000. Fischer and Goldberger up the ante, and then again.

Going once, going twice … sold to Fischer and Goldberger for $150,000.

Manhattan |
Internet domain |
Ari |
By Bebeto Matthews, AP |
Internet business

“You got it,” a smiling Fischer tells Eli. Mazel tovs are exchanged.

These are boom times in an estimated $2 billion
industry that involves the buying and selling of domain names. When
people type the generic names into their Web browser’s address field,
sites that generate pay-per-click advertising revenue appear. Such
“direct navigation” bypasses search engines.

“This industry is like the wild, wild West right
now and people have no idea how fast it’s growing,” said Jerry Nolte,
managing partner of Domainer’s Magazine, a new trade publication
devoted to this little-known world.

Some believe the industry’s market value could
reach $4 billion by 2010 as people continue to purchase approximately
90,000 names a day and the number of domain registrars swells.

At the end of first quarter 2007, at least 128
million domain names had been registered worldwide, a 31% increase over
the previous year, according to VeriSign, which runs some of the core
domain name directories for the Internet.

“It’s not about words,” said Monte Cahn, founder
and CEO of Moniker.com, a company that specializes in domain asset
management and held the Manhattan auction. “It’s like real estate. This
industry is only about a decade old. People looked at domain names as a
commodity. It’s a piece of real estate on the Web that can’t be
replaced. It’s your stake in the ground, your stake in the Internet.”

At the Manhattan auction, Fischer and Goldberger
snatched up four names for more than $1.2 million and a fifth for a
client, representing only a handful of the names sold for a total of
$12.4 million during both the live and silent auction.

The auctions were held during a domain conference in June that attracts some of the biggest players in this niche business.

One name — creditcheck.com — went for $3 million
but paled in comparison to the sale of sex.com, which sold for $12
million last year, according to Cahn, who knew the site’s buyer and

Fischer, 44, of Brooklyn, N.Y., and Goldberger, 46, of Cherry Hill, N.J., figured there was money to be made early.

Goldberger’s entry into the business was
unorthodox to say the least. In 1996, the Hearst Corp. sued him,
alleging trademark infringement after Goldberger registered
esqwire.com, which resembles one of the company’s magazines.

The two sides eventually settled and Goldberger,
a lawyer, was allowed to keep the name. Word got out that Goldberger
knew something about the thorny legal issues involving Internet domain
names and people began approaching him for advice.

Goldberger’s fascination with the burgeoning industry was sealed.

“I was an entrepreneur strapped into this
suit-and-tie job,” Goldberger said. “Kind of a square peg in a round
whole and this lawsuit just kind of changed everything for me.”

He eventually left the respected Philadelphia
law firm where he worked in 1997 and joined a small start-up in
Manhattan called mail.com, which was buying up domain names.

Goldberger began collaborating with Fischer in
2001, building their portfolio of domain names. Together, they became a
formidable yet quirky team (imagine George Costanza and Jerry Seinfeld
with the pioneering spirit of Lewis and Clark).

Two years later, they created a company called
smartname.com, which they sold earlier this year. The company took
names and provided content and links for owners, getting a cut of the
advertising revenue. At one point, smartname.com represented 150 owners
with about 150,000 domain names, generating 50 million unique visitors
a month.

Most the sites are lucrative for their
advertising dollars. For example, megayachts.com isn’t an actual
yachting site, but it contains numerous ads and links for real yacht
companies, boats and cruises. The owners of the site get paid each time
a viewer clicks on one of those links.

Goldberger and Fischer declined to say how much money they make from pay-per-click advertising.

Bob Parsons, CEO and founder of domain registration company GoDaddy.com, says this type of business is fairly straightforward.

“They make their money in two ways,” Parsons
said. “One way is through the traffic they get and the other is the
appreciation of the name.”

Parson didn’t think there was anything wrong
with the practice as long as those involved weren’t using names
trademarked by others.

“Domain names are becoming 21st century real
estate,” Parsons said. “Just owning a domain name as an investment, I
don’t see a problem with that.”

Anthony Malutta, a lawyer who specializes in
trademark law at a San Francisco law firm, sees fewer trademark
infringement cases thanks to improved laws.

“Trademark law involving domain laws is much
clearer and much easier to understand,” he said. “It’s pretty clear
that registering a domain name that corresponds to somebody’s trademark
is actionable. As to generics, they’re just hoping to capture traffic.
You’re just counting on people typing in generic names instead of using
a search engine like Google.”

Malutta said domainers like Goldberger and
Fischer are not “gaming the system” which in his opinion would mean
registering domain names and then cybersquatting — driving revenue off
somebody else’s trademarked name like Coca-Cola.

Over the years, Goldberger and Fischer have
sharpened their formula for acquiring domain names and developing the
sites using a fairly simple template, relying on research, savvy and
plenty of instinct.

“You either know it or don’t by hearing the name,” Fischer says.

They look for names that hit the “sweet spot” —
short words that describe a high-value product or services related to
it. Words that allow them to own a category such as bald.com and
cardiology.com, two of the domain names they bought at the auction.

To help figure out a word’s potential value,
they see how many hits it will produce using Google. They also troll
lists of names with domain registrations set to expire, enabling them
to get a jump on buying it.

They don’t bother with dot-nets or the others.

“Dot-com is king,” Goldberger said. “Dot-net is worthless.”

But there’s a big divide between thinking of a
good name and getting it. There’s usually a chase, with Fischer trying
to persuade owners to sell the names after he locates the owners unless
it’s up for auction.

“He’s kind of like a rhinoceros,” Goldberger
says about Fischer. “He chases them up a tree and waits them out. He
has patience and determination. You got to be aggressive. It’s a tough
game now. It’s like the gold rush. The first guys did really well then
it became more difficult.”

And expensive. Five years ago, the duo could get
a good name for $10,000. Now the minimum is more like $100,000 — as the
auction proved. The cheapest name they bought at the auction was
blogging.com for $135,000. Other names sold for considerably less like
irishwhiskey.com ($8,000) and Jewishdeli.com ($9,000).

At the moment, Fischer, Goldberger and Eli are
sitting on their names. They’ve recently turned down million-dollar
offers for stocks.com and home.com.

But as white-hot as this business has been, it might not continue to mint millionaires.

“How long will this model last?” Malutta asked.
“It’s definitely a temporal piece of real estate. As technology
evolves, maybe direct navigation will fall off the charts and there
goes your property.”

Associated Press investigative researcher Randy Herschaft in New York contributed to this report.